Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-09-18 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is much better than the Motorola Moto Z3's 77.6 score. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a noticeably heavier phone than Motorola Moto Z3, but they have the same thickness. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM. Moto Z3 has a display that's very similar to Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's display, because although the Moto Z3 has a way worse 1080 x 2160 resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixel density.
Motorola Moto Z3 has a better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a bit better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have a 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has better video frame rate, a lot bigger sensor and a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photography.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much better battery duration than Moto Z3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z3. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold 2, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto Z3, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.