Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPS |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is much better than Motorola One 5G Ace's general score of 81.6. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the Motorola One 5G Ace were released with only a couple months difference, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 construction is noticeably heavier but also way thinner than the Motorola One 5G Ace.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a just a little worse pixel amount in each inch of display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1768 x 2208 and a quite bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little faster processing unit than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Motorola One 5G Ace captures just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola One 5G Ace also counts with a much higher resolution back-facing camera and a larger aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a bit better battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola One 5G Ace, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One 5G Ace. If you want to save some money, you can get Motorola One 5G Ace, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.