Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than the Motorola One Action, with a 94.6 score against 78.5. Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is noticeably heavier than Motorola One Action, it's notably thinner and newer. The Motorola One Action has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2520 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater display pixel density.
Motorola One Action features a greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with greater battery duration than Motorola One Action, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, a same resolution camera in the back and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has better 60 fps video frame rates.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One Action. If you want to save some money, you can buy Motorola One Action, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.