Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is better than Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 overall score. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a newer and notably thinner phone than Motorola One Hyper, but it is much heavier. These devices have the same Android 11 operating system. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a better 1768 x 2208px resolution and a bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a bit better performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Motorola One Hyper features just a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low light images and video and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
The Motorola One Hyper has a greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a little better battery performance than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola One Hyper. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola One Hyper, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.