Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is much better than the Motorola One Vision's 80.7 general score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is newer and notably thinner, but also a lot heavier than Motorola One Vision. Motorola One Vision has a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2520 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better pixels count in each screen inch.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM. The Motorola One Vision features a slightly better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has better battery life than Motorola One Vision, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. The Motorola One Vision captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor capturing lower quality photos and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in low light environments and a way higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.