Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the Motorola One Zoom, with a global score of 94.6 against 80. Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a newer and way thinner phone than the Motorola One Zoom, but it is noticeably heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a larger screen and a better resolution of 1768 x 2208.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit better performance than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a slightly better memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little better battery performance than Motorola One Zoom, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier camera sensor taking lower quality photographs and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a back facing camera with way more megapixels and a larger aperture.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola One Zoom, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola One Zoom. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy Z Fold 2, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola One Zoom, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.