Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is just a bit better than Motorola razr (2020), having a overall score of 94.6 against 87. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is incredibly heavier but somewhat thinner than the Motorola razr (2020), and they were released with only 0 months difference. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little bit better looking screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a quite inferior pixel count in each screen inch, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels and a larger screen. The Motorola razr (2020) has as much memory for games and applications as the Galaxy Z Fold 2, they have equal 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a bit better processing power than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory. Motorola razr (2020) has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier sensor taking less light and duller colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a much more megapixels back camera and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much better battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 61% more battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is more expensive than Motorola razr (2020), but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.