Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-09-23 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 8.01 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Polar night |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the Nokia 8.3 5G, having a 94.6 score against 80.5. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is heavier but a lot thinner than Nokia 8.3 5G, and both of them were released with only a couple of months difference. Both phones we compare here include the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit more vivid display than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1768 x 2208 and a quite larger display. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit better performance than Nokia 8.3 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes just a bit better photos and videos than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a lower video definition and a camera with much less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low light images and videos and a lot bigger sensor. Nokia 8.3 5G has a slightly better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB.
Nokia 8.3 5G's battery life is just as good as the battery lifetime in Galaxy Z Fold 2.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Nokia 8.3 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Nokia 8.3 5G. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Nokia 8.3 5G, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.