Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Meteor grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, with a general score of 94.6 against 80.3. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is extremely thinner but somewhat heavier than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and both of them were released with only 2 months difference. These phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a newer 11 version and Nokia 8 V 5G UW has Android 10 version, so it offers a lot of extra features and improved performance.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit more powerful processor than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 6 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little more vivid screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little worse pixels quantity per inch of display, it also counts with a quite bigger display and a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208px.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit more memory to install games and applications than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Nokia 8 V 5G UW and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 both have similar batteries performance. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels and a bigger sensor.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Nokia 8 V 5G UW. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy Z Fold 2, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.