Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 35.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2007-11-13 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 1945.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 2 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 200 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 6.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | -- |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | -- |
| Adreno 650 GPU | GPU |
| 9.81 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 1 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 1.4 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 3.20 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 0.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 300 hours standby time 3 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 2.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than the Nokia 8800 Arte's score of 35.7. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is much newer and incredibly thinner, but much heavier than Nokia 8800 Arte. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a way better processing power than Nokia 8800 Arte, because it has more CPU cores.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much sharper screen than Nokia 8800 Arte, because it has a much better display pixel density, a lot larger display and a much higher resolution of 1768 x 2208px. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a lot better camera than Nokia 8800 Arte, because it has a much higher (4K) video resolution and a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Nokia 8800 Arte, because it has 255 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Nokia 8800 Arte, because it has a 350% larger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is also cheap compared to the Nokia 8800 Arte, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.