Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than Nokia 9 PureView, with a 94.6 score against 76.4. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is newer and somewhat thinner than the Nokia 9 PureView's, but it's notably heavier. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a bit higher 1440 x 2880px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better hardware performance than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, a 12 mega pixels camera and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has faster video frame rates and a way larger camera sensor taking way better quality photographs and videos.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features better battery performance than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 costs a lot more money than the Nokia 9 PureView, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.