Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | -- |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is better than Nokia XR20's global score of 80.8. Both phones in this comparison have the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Even though Galaxy Z Fold 2 is older than Nokia XR20, it's body is a bit lighter and notably thinner. The Nokia XR20 has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bit greater quantity of pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little bit better performance than Nokia XR20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Nokia XR20 captures slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a way smaller back camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Nokia XR20 counts with a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Nokia XR20 has just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Nokia XR20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Nokia XR20. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Nokia XR20, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.