Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, with a 94.6 score against 75.8. Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a newer and a lot thinner cellphone than nubia Red Magic 3S, although it is also a lot heavier. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a display that's just as good as the Galaxy Z Fold 2 one, because although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit smaller screen and a much lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher count of pixels per inch in the screen. The nubia Red Magic 3S's memory capacity for applications and games is just as good as the Galaxy Z Fold 2 one, both of them have equal 256 GB internal memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a processing unit that's very similar to the Galaxy Z Fold 2 one, both have a Octa-Core processor and 12 GB of RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Nubia Red Magic 3S captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller camera sensor, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a bigger aperture and a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot more expensive than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.