Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is much better than the OPPO Find X2's 79.7 general score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and OPPO Find X2 were released only a couple of months apart, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is somewhat thinner but noticeably heavier than OPPO Find X2. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 has Android 10 version, so it counts with some extra features and improved performance.
OPPO Find X2 has a more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 3168px resolution and a higher pixels count per display inch. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit more powerful processing unit than OPPO Find X2. They have 8 CPU cores and a 12 GB RAM.
OPPO Find X2 counts with as much memory capacity for applications and games as the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, they have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a bit longer battery duration than OPPO Find X2, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4200mAh.
The OPPO Find X2 captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller sensor, and they both have the same video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low light photos and videos and a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.