Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is a lot better than OPPO Find X2 Neo's 77.7 global score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10 version. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is a lot heavier but just a bit thinner than OPPO Find X2 Neo, and they were only released 4 months apart.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better CPU than OPPO Find X2 Neo. They have 12 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
OPPO Find X2 Neo's storage to store more games and applications is just as good as Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's one, both have exactly the same internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X2 Neo shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier sensor taking worse quality photos and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a camera with a lot higher 48 MP resolution and a larger aperture to take better photography in low-light situations.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has a 12% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.