Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, having a 94.6 score against 83.1. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is much thinner but much heavier than OPPO Find X2 Pro, and both were released with only a few months difference.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a brighter screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel number per screen inch and a slightly higher 1440 x 3168 resolution. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit faster processing unit than OPPO Find X2 Pro. They have a 12 GB RAM memory and 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit superior battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a lot larger back camera sensor taking way better quality photographs and videos, a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.