Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than OPPO Find X3 Neo, getting a 94.6 score against 76. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is somewhat thinner but extremely heavier than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, and both of them were released with only 7 months difference. Both phones in this comparison use the same Android 11 OS.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a much better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a quite better pixels count per inch in the display. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Find X3 Neo. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 12 GB RAM memory.
OPPO Find X3 Neo features as much storage to install games and applications as Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, both have equal 256 GB internal storage. OPPO Find X3 Neo features a slightly better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, a same size diafragm aperture and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a back facing camera with a lot better 50 MP resolution.
OPPO Find X3 Neo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 both count with really similar batteries duration.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 costs a lot more than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.