Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-12-03 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, getting a general score of 94.6 against 82.1. Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is incredibly thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, although it is way heavier and was released about 15 months before. Both of these devices include Android OS, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has Android 12 version.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a way higher 1768 x 2208 pixels resolution, a better pixels density and a larger display.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a superior storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G features just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower resolution, and they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a way higher (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.