Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than the Galaxy A15 5G, getting a global score of 94.6 against 77.4. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has older 11 version and Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a incredibly older and extremely heavier phone than the Galaxy A15 5G, but Samsung was able to make it thinner anyway.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much better hardware performance than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy A15 5G features a bit better display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a way lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater display density.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G's camera is very similar to the camera in Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality and the same camera aperture, it also counts with a back camera with much more mega-pixels. The Galaxy A15 5G counts with a bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G counts with a little longer battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A15 5G. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, else you can save some money and get the Galaxy A15 5G, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.