Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is better than Galaxy A22 5G's score of 84.6. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is incredibly thinner than the Galaxy A22 5G, although it is a lot heavier and was released about 9 months before. Both devices we are comparing include the same Android 11 OS.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Galaxy A22 5G have very similar displays, because although the Galaxy A22 5G has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better display density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a camera in the back with a much worse 12 MP resolution, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Galaxy A22 5G has a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.