Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is better than the Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 general score. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an older 11 version while Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 2 is notably older and way heavier than the Galaxy A25 5G, it's body is still thinner.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 6 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy A25 5G features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a lot worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a bit higher pixels density.
The Galaxy A25 5G takes clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a lot smaller sensor offering a way lower image quality and slower video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same video quality, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a camera with much more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a better storage for apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.