Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than the Galaxy A30, with a 94.6 score against 79.6. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 2 is noticeably heavier than Galaxy A30, it's a little thinner and newer. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a better 1768 x 2208 resolution and a larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a much lower 12 MP resolution camera and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.