Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than the Galaxy A30s, having a overall score of 94.6 against 79.8. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect. Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is newer and a little bit thinner than the Galaxy A30s's, but it is extremely heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a brighter display than Galaxy A30s, because it has a better screen density, a larger screen and a much better resolution of 1768 x 2208. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a superior processing unit than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A30s has just a bit more memory for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and videos in low light environments and a much worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little longer battery life than Galaxy A30s, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.