Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is better than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 overall score. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it's notably heavier and was released many years before. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little smaller screen and a way lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a lot better processing power than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy A35 5G features just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh. The Galaxy A35 5G captures slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photographs and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a way better 50 megapixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.