Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than Galaxy A50, having a 94.6 score against 83.8. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much heavier than the Galaxy A50, it's a little thinner and also newer. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a display that is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has a little smaller display and a lot worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little higher pixels quantity per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 13 percent greater battery size. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and a much less megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a much higher video resolution and a lot bigger sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A50. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, else you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A50, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.