Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A50s, having a 94.6 score against 86.6. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a more recent 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A50s has Android 10, offering lots of additional features and better performance. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is extremely heavier than Samsung Galaxy A50s, it's a little thinner and newer.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit better performance than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy A50s and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 both count with extremely similar displays, because although the Galaxy A50s has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier sensor taking less light and dull colors, a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos and videos and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy A50s features a little bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A50s, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.