Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a bit better than Galaxy A52, getting a global score of 94.6 against 90.7. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the Galaxy A52 were only released 6 months apart, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is incredibly heavier but somewhat thinner than the Galaxy A52.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A52 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 have very similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 has a little smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher count of pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy A52 captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher resolution and a larger camera sensor shooting better quality pictures.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a battery duration that's just as good as the battery life in Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.