Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is much better than Galaxy F41's global score of 85.2. Both phones in our current comparison have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any differences in that aspect. Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Galaxy F41 were released only 1 months apart, Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is a lot heavier but extremely thinner than Galaxy F41.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a much lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little higher pixels count in each display inch.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy F41, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy F41 has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also counts with a much higher resolution back-facing camera and a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy F41 has greater battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.