Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy F62's general score of 88.1. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 operating system. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is a lot heavier but way thinner than Galaxy F62, and they were only released with a couple of months difference.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and more cores. The Galaxy F62 has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a little higher display pixel density.
Galaxy F62 has a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 56% more battery size.
Galaxy F62 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.