Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, getting a score of 94.6 against 90.8. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is heavier but thinner than the Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and both of them were released with only a couple months difference. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a display that's just as good as Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's screen, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel amount per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 shoots slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same camera sensor size, a 12 mega-pixels camera in the back and a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a way better 7680x4320 video definition. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy Note 20. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note 20, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.