Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than Galaxy Note3, having a 94.6 score against 77.7. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is notably newer and thinner, but also much heavier than the Galaxy Note3. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has older 11 version and Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel number in each inch of screen, it also counts with a better 1768 x 2208 resolution and a way bigger screen. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a larger number of cores (and also faster) and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a back camera with less mega pixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better captures and videos in low light situations and a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a superior battery performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.