Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than Galaxy Note7, getting a 94.6 score against 79.5. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is notably heavier than the Galaxy Note7, it's thinner and also noticeably newer. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a greater performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has a larger number of cores and 8 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note7 has a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite lower 1440 x 2560 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with better battery performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better camera than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have a 12 MP resolution back camera and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor which offers a much better image and video quality and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.