Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a little bit better than Galaxy S10e, having a 94.6 score against 86.3. Even though the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much heavier than Galaxy S10e, it's thinner and newer. Galaxy S10e counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a much smaller display and a way worse 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit better pixels quantity per inch of screen.
Galaxy S10e features a little bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same resolution camera, the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3100mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy S10e, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy S10e. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S10e, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.