Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's 94.6 general score. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has Android 11, so it offers lots of additional features and performance enhancements. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's construction is incredibly lighter but way thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, and both of them were released only a couple of months apart.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little faster CPU than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G. Both have 12 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photographs, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.