Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S22's 93.4 score. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version while Galaxy S22 has Android 13 version. Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is older and heavier than the Galaxy S22, it's construction is still a little thinner.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S22, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy S22 features a much sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a lot lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels density.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S22, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features superior battery duration than Galaxy S22, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. Galaxy S22 takes better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S22 also has a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels, a much higher video definition and a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy S22, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy S22. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy S22, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.