Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, with a general score of 95.4 against 94.6. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has Android 11 version, so it gives some extra features and performance improvements. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is noticeably thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, it's lighter and newer.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better looking screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a better screen pixels density.
Galaxy S22 Ultra takes greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a camera with a much better 108 megapixels resolution, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a much bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a little longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, Galaxy S22 Ultra is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.