Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-18 | -- |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | -- |
| 9.95 ounces | -- |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S25's overall score of 82.6. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S25 has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a really superior performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S25 counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little smaller screen and a lot worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit higher pixels number in each inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy S25, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy S25 features a way better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S25 also has a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a higher image and video quality and a much better 50 MP resolution back facing camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy S25, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy S25. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy S25, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.