Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-18 | -- |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | -- |
| 9.95 ounces | -- |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, getting a overall score of 94.6 against 90.7. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and 12 GB of RAM.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3088 and more pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a larger aperture to take better low-light captures, a much better video resolution, a camera in the back with way more MP and a lot larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra and Galaxy Z Fold 2 count with similar storage to install applications and games, they have equal internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.