Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's overall score of 77.8. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot heavier than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, it's thinner and also a lot newer.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little faster CPU than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM and more CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a really smaller screen and a lot worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher display pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a worse video definition and a camera with much less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a bigger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with much more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much better battery duration than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy S5 Sport, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy S5 Sport. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy S5 Sport, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.