Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-03-12 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than the Galaxy XCover 5, with a overall score of 94.6 against 78.1. Both phones in this comparison work with the same Android 11 OS. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the Galaxy XCover 5 were only released 6 months apart, Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is way thinner but a lot heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch of display, a much better 1768 x 2208 resolution and a lot bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a lot worse resolution back facing camera, and they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a much better video quality. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little bit more memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a superior battery performance than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.