Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | -- |
| 372 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is much better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's overall score of 80.1. Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is extremely thinner but a little heavier than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and both were released only 6 months apart. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an older 11 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a bit lower 1440 x 2560 resolution, it also counts with a much greater pixel quantity per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a way bigger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a much higher video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the Galaxy XCover FieldPro have similar batteries.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 costs a lot more money than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.