Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is a bit better than the Galaxy Z Flip's 88.5 global score. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an older 11 version while Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12 version. Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is heavier but a little bit thinner than the Galaxy Z Flip, and they were released only a few months apart.
Galaxy Z Flip features a slightly better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2636px, it also counts with a bit better pixels density. Galaxy Z Flip and Galaxy Z Fold 2 have very similar memory capacity for apps and games, both have equal internal storage.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a same resolution camera, a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a lot bigger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with superior battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 36% larger battery size.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is more expensive than the Galaxy Z Flip, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.