Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than Galaxy Z Flip 3, having a 94.6 score against 85.6. Galaxy Z Fold 2's design has the same thickness than Galaxy Z Flip 3, but it is noticeably heavier. Both devices in this comparison work with the same Android 11 operating system. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2636px, it also counts with a bit higher screen pixels density. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3. Both of them have the same resolution back-facing camera and the same camera aperture.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 36 percent more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy Z Flip 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy Z Flip 3. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold 2, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy Z Flip 3, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.