Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, getting a 94.6 score against 90.6. Despite being the best we are comparing, it must be told that it is also older, a little thicker and a little bit heavier. These devices use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding operating system features.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3. They have a Octa-Core processor and a 12 GB RAM. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold 3. They have a display with the same size, a greater amount of pixels per screen inch and an equal 1768 x 2208px resolution.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Galaxy Z Fold 2 have quite similar storage for applications and games, both of them have exactly the same internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a back-facing camera with a 12 megapixels resolution, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.