Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2023-05-11 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.50 x 2.80 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black, Khaki Green and Platinum Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 3840 x 1644 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 643 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.74 inches (1/1.35") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than the Xperia 1 V, getting a score of 94.6 against 82.7. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is somewhat thinner than the Xperia 1 V, although it is heavier and was released many years before. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version while Xperia 1 V has Android 13 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much better performing processor than Sony Xperia 1 V. Both have 8 cpu cores and a 12 GB RAM memory. The Xperia 1 V has a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with way more pixels per screen inch and a higher 1644 x 3840 pixels resolution.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Xperia 1 V both count with very similar memory for applications and games, they have the same 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xperia 1 V has just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Xperia 1 V features a better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photography, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Xperia 1 V also counts with better video frame rate, a lot more mega-pixels camera and a way bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.