Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.18 x 2.72 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is a lot better than Xperia 10 II's general score of 78.5. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is notably heavier but somewhat thinner than the Xperia 10 II, and both of them were only released 5 months apart. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the newer 11 version and Xperia 10 II has Android 10 version, giving some nice extra features and better performance.
The Sony Xperia 10 II features a slightly better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a much smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels amount in each inch in the display. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit faster processing unit than Sony Xperia 10 II, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Xperia 10 II, and although they both have a same resolution back camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has better video frame rate, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality and a larger camera aperture.
Xperia 10 II has more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with longer battery duration than Sony Xperia 10 II, because it has a 25 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.