Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-06-11 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.08 x 2.69 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than Xperia 10 III, with a general score of 94.6 against 83.7. Both of these devices work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Even though Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the Xperia 10 III were released with only 9 months difference, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is way heavier but somewhat thinner than the Xperia 10 III.
The Xperia 10 III features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels and a way smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better screen pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a bit better processing power than Xperia 10 III, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit better camera than Sony Xperia 10 III, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same (4K) video definition and the same resolution camera in the back, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has higher 60 fps video frame rates and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
The Xperia 10 III has a greater storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Sony Xperia 10 III's battery performance is just as good as the Galaxy Z Fold 2 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.