Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is way better than Xperia XZs's overall score of 77.2. Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is way newer and thinner, but a lot heavier than Xperia XZs. Xperia XZs counts with a screen that's very similar to Galaxy Z Fold 2's display, because although the Xperia XZs has a lot worse 1080 x 1920px resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit superior CPU than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a larger number of cores and 8 GB more RAM. Xperia XZs has a much better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a lot tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting much lower quality videos and photographs and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xperia XZs also counts with better video frame rate and a back camera with much more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Xperia XZs, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much better battery performance than Xperia XZs, because it has a 55% greater battery size.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot more expensive than Xperia XZs, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.