Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than TCL 20 Pro 5G's score of 76.1. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 2 and TCL 20 Pro 5G were only released with a couple months difference, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is extremely thinner but also incredibly heavier than TCL 20 Pro 5G. Both phones in this comparison review have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both should provide you very similar OS features.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a bit better looking screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a little bit lower quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a better 1768 x 2208 pixels resolution. TCL 20 Pro 5G has a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have equal internal memory, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a little better hardware performance than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 6 GB more RAM. TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has lower video frame rate and a smaller back camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 and TCL 20 Pro 5G count with quite similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.