Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-09-15 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.32 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Bubblegum Blue, Peach Pink, Snowflake White and Truffle Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4250mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the Xiaomi 11 lite 5G NE, having a general score of 94.6 against 81.4. Both phones in this review have the same Android 11 operating system. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a much heavier device than Xiaomi 11 lite 5G NE, but both are equally thin. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi 11 lite 5G NE, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 6 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the Xiaomi 11 lite 5G NE feature extremely similar screens, because although the Xiaomi 11 lite 5G NE has a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures better videos and photos than Xiaomi 11 lite 5G NE, because although it has a back facing camera with lot less mega pixels, and they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a much larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi 11 lite 5G NE, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little longer battery performance than Xiaomi 11 lite 5G NE, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.